<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paul Raven on Headless</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamroberts.com/2007/12/17/paul-raven-on-headless/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamroberts.com/2007/12/17/paul-raven-on-headless/</link>
	<description>The latest news from author Adam Roberts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:11:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamR</title>
		<link>http://www.adamroberts.com/2007/12/17/paul-raven-on-headless/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 10:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamroberts.com/2007/12/17/paul-raven-on-headless/#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Yes, it is as I feared.  Is there a name for a google search on two words that returns precisely two hits? Googledemiwhack, maybe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, it is as I feared.  Is there a name for a google search on two words that returns precisely two hits? Googledemiwhack, maybe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reda</title>
		<link>http://www.adamroberts.com/2007/12/17/paul-raven-on-headless/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Reda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Dec 2007 02:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamroberts.com/2007/12/17/paul-raven-on-headless/#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Alas, your mention of &#039;clever albatross&#039; in this blogpost undoes &#039;clever albatross&#039;s Googlewhack status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alas, your mention of 'clever albatross' in this blogpost undoes 'clever albatross's Googlewhack status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamR</title>
		<link>http://www.adamroberts.com/2007/12/17/paul-raven-on-headless/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamroberts.com/2007/12/17/paul-raven-on-headless/#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Of course, as an instinctive poststructuralist, you&#039;ll understand (instinctively) that the author is dead.

If you&#039;re asking me, though, I could say (from beyond-the-grave): it really did seem to me a very penetrating and generous review.  But then again, what do I know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course, as an instinctive poststructuralist, you'll understand (instinctively) that the author is dead.</p>
<p>If you're asking me, though, I could say (from beyond-the-grave): it really did seem to me a very penetrating and generous review.  But then again, what do I know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Raven</title>
		<link>http://www.adamroberts.com/2007/12/17/paul-raven-on-headless/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 17:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamroberts.com/2007/12/17/paul-raven-on-headless/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Most clever, indeed - I think you&#039;ve seen my distinction, there. 

The question that remains for me is did I &#039;get it&#039;? While I&#039;m told (by people who have actually studied this LitCrit thing properly) that I&#039;m an instinctive poststructuralist (erm, OK), I&#039;m always keen to determine whether or not I actually understood what the author was *trying* to do with a story ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most clever, indeed - I think you've seen my distinction, there. </p>
<p>The question that remains for me is did I 'get it'? While I'm told (by people who have actually studied this LitCrit thing properly) that I'm an instinctive poststructuralist (erm, OK), I'm always keen to determine whether or not I actually understood what the author was *trying* to do with a story ...</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
