Search


About Adam

Adam Roberts is the author of a growing number of science fiction novels, short stories, essays and other writings. This site contains not just his blog, but everything you could ever want to know about everything Adam has ever published. And more...

Recent Posts

Other Roberts Blogs

Links / Blogroll

Clarke Award tonight

By Adam Roberts | April 28, 2010
Categories: Awards

Very exciting. For the record, I predict a win for either Miéville or Jones, with Robinson running a good race and coming up on the right hand side. I haven't yet got around to reading Far North, so can't say whether it does or doesn't have a chance, or does or doesn't deserve the prize on merits. But I've read the other five, and that means I know that it's an unusually strong shortlist this year. Which is a little frustrating ... why do I have to get shortlisted alongside so many superb novels? Why can't the list be my book and five pisspoor, makeweight titles? Although, of course, not really: if I do not win tonight (and I don't expect to) then losing to a pisspoor rival would be much worse than losing to books of the brilliance of Miéville's or Jones's or Robinson's.

They're strange occasions, these awards. To slip into the third-person: one tries not to get too worked up about them, or to lose too much of one's cool; but inevitably things becomes increasingly exciting and jitter-provoking the closer to the actual announcement one gets. By the time you're at the fumbling-open-the-gold-envelope part, you're no longer thinking 'oo I hope I win!' You're thinking 'let's get this over with.' Those screenshots of the Oscars with five separate boxes and an anxious star in each? When the winner is announced, and the other four furiously applaud, they're not being disingenuous, you know. Perhaps they really are graceful losers, or perhaps they will, later, seethe with resentment; but in the moment they're experiencing a rush of pure relief that manifests as real happiness for the other actor.

On the upside, there have been some more reviews of all the shortlisted titles, some of them (the reviews I mean) very interesting. Niall Harrison, that tall man, links to some of these; and here's Dan Hartland's whole shortlist review at SH (and part II). He's not so keen on YBT, as it goes, though he says some interesting and perceptive things about the novel nonetheless. And I can't argue with his main point: he looks for an aesthetic unity in his fiction (he says he has 'a kink for it'); where I, although I acknowlege the tremendous gravitational appeal of that sort of unity, mistrust it, and consider it one of my jobs as a writer to go through the balanced, harmonious whole fucking it up in various, and I would hope creative, ways. That's a differend, right there.

One small niggle I have. Hartland:

There is also the Russian question. In a post on her own blog, the novelist Catherynne Valente charged Roberts with egregious cultural appropriation, marshalling several arguments in order to show that the novel's grasp on Russian and Soviet culture is tenuous and at times wholly wrong-headed. Some examples are less serious than others—that Skvorecky, when arrested by the KGB, angrily (but impotently) demands he has rights, is surely more forgivable than the suggestion that the genre and literary circles depicted in the novel might bear no relation to their counterparts in reality.

Nitpicking with statements like is really of no interest to anybody but a particular breed of pedantry-minded author (which is why I bury this at the bottom of a post few will read, rather than weighing in on Hartland's unpedantic, thoughtful piece); but this isn't right. What I mean is: I don't argue with Catherynne Valente's dislike of the novel; for maybe it is as shit as she says, and certainly her reaction is inalienably hers. And if I read her correctly, although that dislike does come in part from a sense that 'the novel's grasp on Russian and Soviet culture is tenuous and at times wholly wrong-headed', it really has more to do with a broader dislike of the book's tone and approach together with a diagnosis of deplorable fatphobia in my imagination. But I have to say: this particular bit isn't right. Though Valente and Hartland both say he does, Skvorecky, does not angrily (but impotently) demand his rights when arrested by the KGB. It's true that he does, after lengthy interrogation by several Militia (not KGB) officers, ask with what he has been charged; but that's not the same thing. Asking the police 'what are the charges?', even in a tyrannical state, isn't so unbelievable as demanding the KGB respect one's human rights, I think.

No tags for this post.

5 Comments to-date;

5 Responses to “Clarke Award tonight”

  1. Notes on a Shortlist « Torque Control Says:
    April 28th, 2010 at 12:01 pm

    [...] of “painfully inept cultural appropriation” (on which Roberts lightly comments here). That is: it is hamfisted as a depiction of Russian-ness. To me, the novel seems much more about [...]

  2. Dan Hartland Says:
    April 28th, 2010 at 1:18 pm

    Fair cop, guv. In interrogating Valente's position (and, after all, I'm basically saying that even had Skvorecky done what he in fact did not, it wouldn't have been an issue for me), I did, well, take her word for it. D'oh.

    While we're nit-picking, though, I'd emphasise that I don't dislike the novel - far, far from it. (In the piece, I write, "it is undoubtedly one of the finest novels written within the field, and probably outside of it, last year." Which is fairly unambiguous.) It's simply that, reading the novel in context with the others, and therefore in the spirit of comparative competition which an award encourages, some stuff occurred to me.

    Anyway, regardless: the best of luck tonight, sir.

  3. Adam Roberts Says:
    April 28th, 2010 at 1:30 pm

    Dan: absolutely. Having read both halves of your piece now I think I understand, and completely respect, your position.

    I think I'll edit out that last paragraph. I really do get sucked down a pernickerty-pedantic whirlpool, there. Let the record show that this post originally etc etc.

  4. Tweets that mention Clarke Award tonight | www.AdamRoberts.com -- Topsy.com Says:
    April 28th, 2010 at 1:43 pm

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gollancz, Next Read, Jason Baki, The Clarke Award, Night Shade Books and others. Night Shade Books said: Adam Roberts: Clarke Award tonight: Very exciting. For the record, I predict a win for either Miéville or Jones, w... http://bit.ly/chfYA0 [...]

  5. Tweets that mention Clarke Award tonight | www.AdamRoberts.com -- Topsy.com Says:
    April 29th, 2010 at 10:50 am

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gollancz, Next Read, Jason Baki, Adam Roberts, The Clarke Award and others. The Clarke Award said: RT @Gollancz: http://bit.ly/b3NiL7 @arrroberts on being shortlisted for the Clarke oh and musing on reviews as well. (via @nextread) [...]

Comments